Despite officially undermining the degree of those connections, FIRST ON FOX, a controversial criminal advocacy group funded by left-wing organizations, works with courts and experts in climate change litigation. In response to censure of the project, Environmental Law Institute Climate Judiciary Project President Jordan Diamond wrote in a recent email to The Wall Street Journal that “CJP doesn’t join in dispute, support or coordinate with any parties in litigation, or guide judges on how to act in any case.” The Washington, D. C. based Environmental Law Institute ( ELI ) created the Climate Judiciary Project ( CJP) in 2018, establishing a first-of-its-kind resource to provide “reliable, up-to-date information” about climate change litigation, according to the group. The scope of the project, which includes strong appellate courts, has expanded to several state and federal courts, as well as comes as numerous cities and states pursue high-profile lawsuits against the oil industry. A Fox News Digital review reveals that many CJP specialist attorneys and judges are deeply involved in environment dispute and have close relationships to the curriculum. At the 2022 Ninth Circuit Judicial Conference on July 20, 2022, DARK MONEY FUND PURRED MILLIONS OF DOLLARS INTO ECO ACTIVIST GROUPS BLOCKING HIGHWAYS. Oppenheimer has a longer history of filing climate-related amicus brief from 2019-2022 in dispute across various states. Professor Robert Kundis Craig of the University of Utah’s Law School, Robert Kundis Craig, wrote a unit for CJP in 2022 and has also submitted some amicus briefs demonstrating her involvement in court situations. One instance occurred in 2023 when Justice Mark Recktenwald, who, according to Fox News Digital, slowly disclosed last year that he presented for an April lessons in cooperation with the Environmental Law Institute Climate Judiciary Project, signed an order that granted legal scholars ‘ requests for amnesty. In conjunction with CJP, Racktenwald co-presented a conference entitled” Hurricanes in a Changing Climate and Related Prosecution” at December 2022. In a conference titled” Rising Lakes and Litigation: What Judges Need to Know About Warming-Driven Sea-Level Rise,” Recktenwald’s Hawaii Supreme Court rejected an appeal from fuel firms to shove a lawsuit about Honolulu weather propaganda. In Hawaii position court in July 2022, Craig also filed an amnesty, and Judge Jeffrey Crabtree approved of the brief’s filing. The National Judicial College Curriculum Development Committee, which develops courses for” Environmental Law Essential for the Judiciary,” is a group of people who are members of it. ” Don’t underestimate the importance of the part of state court courts in economic law”, the curriculum’s website says. Ann Carlson, who joined the Biden administration in 2021, served on ELI’s board of directors for decades while even “providing pro bono consulting” for Sher Edling, an ecology law firm representing a number of states, on litigation against oil firms, financial statements showed. Meredith Wilensky, a former Sher Edling attorney, and Michael Burger, a former Sher Edling attorney, both participated in numerous Emily occasions. Researchers SAYBURGER is the senior director of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law and an ELI reporter who has filed amicus brief in support of plaintiffs in weather situations across the United States. UCLA’s Emmett Institute on Climate Change and the Environment hosted a talk in October 2017 with Sher Edling’s Vic Sher,” Suing Over Climate Change Damages: The First Wave of Climate Lawsuits”. Ann Carlson was the moderator for that discussion. John Dernbach, who is listed as an expert on the website of CJP, submitted an amicus brief in 2019 as part of a group of legal experts who argued for the plaintiffs in City of Oakland v. BP. Judges who attend Climate Judiciary Project events are informed to leave their seats in a left-wing lobbying establishment, according to American Energy Institute President Jason Isaac. ” Under the guise of ‘ judicial education,’ CJP uses activist academics to give a pro-plaintiff sneak peek at climate change lawsuits. The Supreme Court will have an opportunity to hear a case involving whether blue states and far-left mayors like Brandon Johnson can bring legal action against energy companies for climate change in the first few months of this year. Let’s hope the court decides the case and puts an end to the Green New Deal rhetoric. More than 1, 700 judges have taken part in its activities, according to Fox News Digital, who reported that the project has created 13 curriculum modules, hosted 42 events, and hosted more than 1,700 events since it was founded more than five years ago. Additionally, several judges at CJP serve as advisors, which may affect its curriculum and modules.” In addition to this unprecedented litigation, the Environmental Law Institute ( ELI ) launched a first-of-its-kind effort to provide judges with’education on climate science, the impacts of climate change, and the ways climate science is arising in the law. It appears that ELI’s goal in providing this’ education,’ however, may be to influence judges to side with plaintiffs in climate change cases. Carlson was named as one of the program’s architects in the letter, which added that the Committee needed to know how much the efforts of both Ms. Carlson and ELI had been used to influence the federal judiciary in its decision-making of climate litigation. Cruz claimed that ELI intends to pass a radical environmental agenda through the courts, which it cannot do. “” To help judges reach those’ appropriate’ decisions, the Project developed the’ Climate Science and Law for Judges Curriculum ‘ ( the Curriculum ). The Curriculum reads like a playbook for judges to use against plaintiffs in artificial climate change cases brought against traditional energy companies, including courses that “examine the human-caused component of]global warming,” such as the” causal connections between emissions” and” changes in the climate.” Because CJP is aware of these ties, an American Energy Institute report from earlier this year claimed that it conceals its relationship with the plaintiffs. ” AE I says Sandra Nichols Thiam, an ELI vice president and director of judicial education, acknowledged as much in a 2023 press statement, saying”, If we even appeared biased or if there was a whiff of bias, we wouldn’t be able to do what we’re doing. “” Taken together, it appears CJP made the thinnest possible disclosures to create the appearance of rectitude,” AE I states”. However, their admissions confirm that CJP exists to facilitate informal, ex-particular exchanges between judges and climate activists through the purview of judicial education. And secrecy remains essential to their operation, whose goal, as Thiam has said, is to develop’ a body of law that supports climate action.’ ” AEI, a group self-described as” dedicated to promoting policies that ensure America’s energy security and economic prosperity,” says CJP’s work is” an attack on the rule of law. “CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP” In America, the powerful aren’t allowed to coax and manipulate judges before their cases are heard,” the report states. In a statement to Fox News Digital, an ELI spokesperson said”, CJP doesn’t participate in litigation, support or coordinate with any parties in litigation, or advise judges on how they should rule in any case. Judges can access reliable data on climate science and legal trends through our courses. Experts in the field are, of course, welcome to contribute their expertise to CJP programs while acting as independent experts in a different field that is unrelated to the CJP program. For judges, continuing education that exposes them to expertise in a wide range of disciplines is a fad and should be encouraged.
Despite claims of fairness, the climate justice class has close ties to judges and legal experts.
