Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts issued a caution on Tuesday that the United States has maintain” criminal independence” only weeks away from President-elect Donald Trump’s opening. Roberts outlined his fears in his annual review on the federal court system. It is not in the essence of administrative work to satisfy everyone. A success and a fool are usually present. Every Administration experiences jury system defeats, Robert wrote in the 15-page statement, “occasionally in cases with significant ramifications for executive or legislative energy or other significant topics.” ” However, for the past several years, the decisions of the authorities, popular or not, had been followed, and the Nation has avoided the skirmishes that plagued the 1950s and 1960s”. ” Within the past few years, but, elected leaders from across the political spectrum have raised the specter of empty disrespect for federal prosecutor decisions”, Roberts said, without naming Trump, President Biden or any particular senator. ” These dangerous suggestions, however sporadic, must be soundly rejected. Judicial independence is worth preserving. An independent judiciary is “essential to the rule of law in any land,” according to my late colleague Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, but it is vulnerable to assault and can be destroyed if the society law exists but doesn’t take care to ensure its preservation. Roberts urged all Americans to respect this inheritance from our founding generation and value its perseverance. DEMOCRATS LAUGHED’CALCULATED EFFORT’ TO ANSWER SCOTUS SINCE DOBBS, CBS REPORTER SAYSRoberts also quoted Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes, who remarked that the three branches of government “must work in successful cooperation” to “make possible the effective functioning of the department of government which is designed to safeguard the interests of liberty with judicial impartiality and independence.” Our political system and economic strength are dependent on the rule of law, according to Roberts. On the verge of victory for the Republican nominee, Roberts praised a landmark Supreme Court immunity decision penned by him, along with another high court decision that stopped attempts to remove Trump from the ballot. Democrats like Biden voiced opposition to the immunity decision after being critical of wealthy benefactors ‘ gifts and undisclosed travels to some justices and later called for term limits and an enforceable ethics code. A judge-appointed judge’s decision to revoke the FDA’s approval of the abortion drug mifepristone last year was overturned by a handful of Democrats and one Republican lawmaker. The Supreme Court later granted the White House a stay that would allow the medication’s continued sale after Binden refused to take any executive steps to circumvent the ruling. The conservative majority of the high court ruled last year that Biden’s massive efforts to forgo student loans were unlawful. The biggest Supreme Court decisions of 2024 range from PRESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY TO OVERTURNING THE CHEVRON DOCTRINEROberts and Trump clashed in 2018 when the chief justice criticized the president for criticizing a judge who referred to his migrant asylum policy as an” Obama judge.” Roberts began his letter on Tuesday by quoting a tale about King George III detaching colonial judges from lifetime appointments, an order that was” not well received.” Trump is currently gearing up for a second term as president with a challenging conservative agenda that could face legal challenges and legal challenges before the court whose conservative majority includes three justices who were appointed by Trump during his first term. The chief justice stated in the annual report that other branches of government must be willing to uphold court decisions even if they are unpopular or represent a defeat for a presidential administration. Roberts cited the Brown v. Board of Education decision that, in 1954, declared schools as one that needed federal regulation in the face of opposition from southern governors. Additionally, he added that “attempts to intimidate judges for their decisions in cases are inappropriate and should be vigorously opposed.” Public officials and others have the right to criticize decisions, but they should also be aware that their statements may “prompt dangerous reactions by others,” according to Roberts. According to statistics from the U.S. Marshals Service, threats aimed at federal judges have more than tripled in the past ten years. In Wisconsin and Maryland, state court judges were killed at their homes in 2022 and 2023, according to Roberts. ” Violence, intimidation, and defiance directed at judges because of their work undermine our Republic, and are wholly unacceptable”, he wrote. The FOX News APPRoberts also criticized disinformation about court decisions as a threat to judges ‘ independence, claiming that social media can cause distortions and even be used by “hostile foreign state actors” to cause divisions. This report was written by The Associated Press.