The decision was made by Jeff Bezos, the writer’s user, according to a person with knowledge of the discussions. Will Lewis, the chief professional, said the report was “returning to our origins” of not making testimonials for the company. Does The Washington Post make an support in the presidential race, continuing a decades-long custom, during which period of days the paper debated among its best leaders? In the end, Jeff Bezos, the writer’s businessman operator, decided that the solution was no. On Friday, Will Lewis, The Post’s general executive, told the newspaper that the document may no longer accept political candidates. His statement came after Mr. Bezos, a person with knowledge of the discussions, had a discussion and made his announcement. According to four persons with knowledge of the process, the writer’s mind section had already created an endorsement for Vice President Kamala Harris at the time. In a statement to the team, Mr. Lewis stated that” The Washington Post will not be making an endorsement of a political candidate in this vote.” ” Nor in any potential presidential vote. The Post had endorsed presidential hopefuls since 1976, according to Mr. Lewis, when it gave Jimmy Carter’s endorsement after the vote, which went on to win. Before that, it generally did not make national accolades, though it made an exception in 1952 to returning Dwight Eisenhower. Concerns about whether The Post would support a candidate for president this year had spread for weeks. Some folks speculated without any supporting evidence that Mr. Bezos ‘ different businesses have numerous federal government contracts, making him the target of a potential Trump presidency. In the days leading up to Friday’s statement, top Post leaders, including Mr. Lewis and the opinions director, David Shipley, made their situation to Mr. Bezos not to stop The Post’s tradition of making a political support, two people familiar with the matter said. After Mr. Bezos made the decision, both gentlemen sold it to The Post’s team. The Post’s representative disputed that account, saying that the decision to not support it was a” Washington Post selection.” Mr. Lewis, in his statement to the team, said much about how The Post had arrived at its choice, adding only that it was no” a tacit support of one prospect” or” a criticism of another”. He referred to an editorial the paper published in 1960 that said it was “wiser for an independent newspaper in the nation’s capital” to avoid an endorsement. We are having trouble locating the article’s source. In your browser’s settings, kindly enable JavaScript. Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times. Thank you for your patience while we verify access. Already a subscriber? Log in. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.